About Me

Name: charbookguy
Biography
Loading...

Create Your Own Blog Find Other Townhall Blogs

Comments

Archives

Winning in Iraq

 This good news from the War on Terror is from CentCom:

Three years ago, there were virtually no security forces in Iraq. Today - Iraqis are standing up military and police forces that number over 300,000. In coming months, the Coalition and the Iraqi government will reach the goal of 325,000 trained and equipped force members.
Quality is improving with quantity. In April 2004, almost all Iraqi forces fled in the face of a militia uprising in Najaf. This August, when militia attacked an Iraqi Army outpost in Diwaniyah, the Iraqi army counterattacked and killed 50 militiamen in the ensuing battle. By the end of August, Iraq’s special-ops brigade, with U.S. combat advisers, had netted 1,320 detainees in 445 operations all over the country this year, including three senior militia leaders and 20 most-wanted individuals. This month, Iraqi forces provided a safe environment for more than four million Shiite pilgrims celebrating the birth of the 12th Imam. And it was Iraqi forces operating independently who recently captured a major Al Qaeda in Iraq.


Pay no mind to what you hear from the MSM. We are winning!
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Clinton as Messiah?

 This bizarre article is from the UK Mirror:

In a speech as powerful as it was persuasive, preacher-man Bill Clinton declared not just Britain needed the Labour Party in government - but the world...And the Manchester conference crowd lapped it up as he urged them to get into the "future-business".
In words that would not have been out of place in the Arkansas churches where he first learned the power of oratory, he thundered: "The great promise of progressive politics in the end is that we really do believe our common humanity is more important than our differences."
At that moment he became warrior and missionary, his faith helping the poor, his battle-plan to end global injustice.
Since quitting the White House six years ago, Bill Clinton has dedicated himself to making the world a better place.
He founded the Clinton Foundation, a charity whose ambitions include battling to halt climate change, stamping out poverty and disease, and "racial, ethnic and religious reconciliation".
No longer forced to pander to narrow interests of US voters, Clinton has taken up cudgels on behalf of world citizenry.


In my opinion, the first requirement of any Savior is he must tell the truth, something Father Clinton has a little trouble with.
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Clinton's Most Recent Mistake

 Appears the former president got a few details wrong in his recent interview with Chris Wallace, according to Richard Miniter:

In his Fox interview, Clinton said "no one knew that al-Qa'ida existed" in October 1993 during the tragic events in Somalia. False. Clinton's national security adviser, Tony Lake, told me that he learned of bin Laden in 1993 and by 1994 regularly briefed the president on the terrorist...

In 1994, Khalid Shaikh Mohammed (who would later plan the 9/11 attacks) launched Operation Bojinka to down 11 planes simultaneously over the Pacific, killing about 3000 people. A sharp-eyed Filipina police officer foiled the plot. The sole American response: increased law-enforcement co-operation with the Philippines.
In 1995, al-Qa'ida detonated a 100kg car bomb outside the US military's Office of the Program Manager in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia, killing five Americans and wounding 60 more. The FBI was sent in.
In 1996, al-Qa'ida bombed the barracks of American pilots patrolling the "no-fly zones" over Iraq, killing 19. Again, the FBI went in.
In 1997, bin Laden repeatedly declared war on the Western world. In February 1997, bin Laden told an Arab television network: "If someone can kill an American soldier, it is better than wasting time on other matters." Clinton did not respond.
In 1998, al-Qa'ida simultaneously attacked US embassies in Kenya and Tanzania, killing 224 people including 12 American diplomats.


And so on. In my own opinion, no one's to blame for 9/11 but Osama Bin Laden and his Al Qaeda cronies, but Clinton does the legacy he's so obsessed over a disservice by denying mistakes.
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Media's Disproportionate Response in Lebanon

 Excellent video from Honest Reporting on Media bias and inaccuracies in the recent Lebanon Conflict.
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

NY Times for Terrorists Rights

 They promote an Al Qaeda Bill of Rights, more concerned with protecting terrorists than the American people. From the NY Times:

Republicans say Congress must act right now to create procedures for charging and trying terrorists — because the men accused of plotting the 9/11 attacks are available for trial. That’s pure propaganda. Those men could have been tried and convicted long ago, but President Bush chose not to. He held them in illegal detention, had them questioned in ways that will make real trials very hard, and invented a transparently illegal system of kangaroo courts to convict them...
Last week, the White House and three Republican senators announced a terrible deal on this legislation that gave Mr. Bush most of what he wanted, including a blanket waiver for crimes Americans may have committed in the service of his antiterrorism policies. Then Vice President ... Cheney and his willing lawmakers rewrote the rest of the measure so that it would give Mr. Bush the power to jail pretty much anyone he wants for as long as he wants without charging them, to unilaterally reinterpret the Geneva Conventions, to authorize what normal people consider torture, and to deny justice to hundreds of men captured in error.
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Bush Out Swinging

 Bush is out swinging on the campaign trail for his party:

The NIE I quoted earlier says this about Iraq. It said, "Perceived jihadist success there," in Iraq, "would inspire more fighters to continue the struggle elsewhere. It also says that "Should jihadists leaving Iraq perceive themselves, and be perceived, to have failed, we judge fewer fighters will be inspired to carry on the fight."
Democrats in Washington have been quoting the NIE a lot in recent days, but you don't hear them quoting that part of the document...


Five years after 9/11, the worst attack on American homeland in our history, the Democrats offer nothing but criticism and obstruction, and endless second-guessing. The party of FDR and the party of Harry Truman has become the party of cut-and-run.

What's sad is the Dems just can't see the drastic change that has occured in their own Party, even as recently as the Kennedy administration.
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Fox Faith

 Glenn Beck and a guest were making fun of this website for Christian Entertainment on his TV show the other day. Maybe Glenn is running with the wrong crowd over at CNN.
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Real War Links

 True stories of our Fighting Forces the MSM won't tell:

Corpsman Helps Build Trust with Iraqis.

America Supports You: Performers S.T.A.N.D. for Troops.

Navy Strike Group Contributing to Iraq, Afghanistan Security.

Polish Troops To Make Up Bulk Of Afghan Reinforcements: Nato.

Battle for Baghdad Update. From Bill Roggio.

"Loss of Anbar' Greatly Exaggerated. Also from Bill.

Soldier hit by anti-tank mine praises up-armor.

Iraqi Soldiers Detain 90 Terrorists.

Iraqi Troops More Effective Every Day, General Says.

Proud of my country and those who guard it.

Soldier's Passion for helping children.
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Al Qaeda in Iraq are "Weak"

 This according Attyia al-Jaza’ri (the Algeria), which was addressed to Abu Musab al-Zarqawi, before the latter's death, in a recently translated letter:

I am now on a visit to them and I am writing you this letter as I am with them, and they have some comments about some of your circumstances... They wish that they had a way to talk to you and advise you, and to guide and instruct you; however, they too are occupied with vicious enemies here. They are also weak, and we ask God that He strengthen them and mend their fractures. They have many of their own problems, but they are people of reason, experience, and sound, beneficial knowledge.

Seems like our President, our brave troops, and the terrorists all believe Al Qaeda is losing in Iraq, with the CIA and Democrats feeling the opposite. Who would you trust?
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (1) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

That Interesting NIE Report

 President Bush at todays press conference  on partisan leakers:

Now, you know what's interesting about the NIE -- it was a intelligence report done last April. As I understand, the conclusions -- the evidence on the conclusions reached was stopped being gathered on February -- at the end of February. And here we are, coming down the stretch in an election campaign, and it's on the front page of your newspapers. Isn't that interesting? Somebody has taken it upon themselves to leak classified information for political purposes.

Take that Clinton. You're not the only one who can wag your finger at the press!
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Blair in Honorable Company

This is the title of my latest article in Opeds.com. An exert:

Whatever Blair’s political future, he has already joined a noble British fellowship by rejecting the appeasement of tyrants. It was former Prime Minister Winston Churchill who mobilized not only his own country against the dire menace of Nazism in the 1930’s and 40’s, but through feverish diplomacy convinced the isolationist Americans the rightness of his cause. As the US military might increased during the war, Britain relinquished its role of world leadership. With the conflict almost won in July 1945, Churchill’s Conservative Party was defeated in elections. The man who only a few years earlier guided his nation through the Battle of Britain and gained the world’s admiration, was out of office.

Another British Conservative, Margaret Thatcher, later restored her Party to power in 1979. The new Prime Minister was a fervent anti-communist, believed in free trade and small government. In 1982, she restored the reputation of the armed forces in the Falklands War, and her economic policy halted decades of British industrial decline. In 1990, she gave spine to the elder Bush’s defiance of Saddam Hussein, encouraging him, “not the go wobbly”.
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

How soon they forget

 President Karzai of Aghanistan spoke at the White House today in response to a reporter question on the leaked NIE that Iraq is breeding terrorists worldwide:

...terrorism was hurting us way before Iraq or September 11th. The President mentioned some examples of it. These extremist forces were killing people in Afghanistan and around for years, closing schools, burning mosques, killing children, uprooting vineyards, with vine trees, grapes hanging on them, forcing populations to poverty and misery.
They came to America on September 11th, but they were attacking you before September 11th in other parts of the world. We are a witness in Afghanistan to what they are and how they can hurt. You are a witness in New York. Do you forget people jumping off the 80th floor or 70th floor when the planes hit them? Can you imagine what it will be for a man or a woman to jump off that high? Who did that? And where are they now? And how do we fight them, how do we get rid of them, other than going after them? Should we wait for them to come and kill us again?


I'm afraid many Americans have forgotten how they felt that day, but the liberal elite forgot first!
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Iraq Breeding Democrats

 
There is a slight grain of truth in this latest attack on the war effort in Iraq. The Conflict is emboldening terrorists the same way it is galvanizing Democrats on the same issue. For the first time in decades, liberals have an issue which appeals to their supporters, after dramatic declines since the 70’s. Democrats see Iraq as another Vietnam, which is odd since their decline as a Party can be directly traced to that debacle, the only time the US ever lost a war. They paint Bush as another Richard Nixon (Bush lied and people died) and Rumsfeld as McNamara. Yet, this easy comparison fails to give a complete picture. Just as terrorist numbers have risen, so has the world’s response to the long ignored threat strengthened enormously. Many nations such as Britain and America now commit their entire military and intelligence resources against Al Qaeda, once only seen as a police matter. In Iraq there are now 300,000 native military troops consigned as a vast anti-insurgency force, in addition to 150,000 US troops. Though, the liberal dominated Media and Democrats may conspire to lose another war as they once did in Vietnam, it is self-defeating for America will never trust a Party weak on National Security.
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Democrats Target Rumsfeld

Rather than learning from mistakes, they seek to censor critics. From the Washington Post:

Democrats Target Rumsfeld

Under assault from Republicans on issues of national security, congressional Democrats are planning to push for a vote of no confidence in Defense Secretary Donald H. Rumsfeld this month as part of a broad effort to stay on the offensive ahead of the November midterm elections.
In Rumsfeld, Democrats believe they have found both a useful antagonist and a stand-in for President Bush and what they see as his blunders in Iraq. This week, Democrats interpreted a speech of his as equating critics of the war in Iraq to appeasers of Adolf Hitler, an interpretation that Pentagon spokesman Eric Ruff disputed. But Democrats said the hyperbolic attack would backfire...

Some Democratic House candidates, such as Diane Farrell in Connecticut's 4th District, have been encouraging Democratic leaders to move formally for a vote of no confidence. And party leadership aides said they are canvassing Democratic members of Congress and exploring the parliamentary mechanism to do so. Before the move is set, the aides said, they want to hear from Democrats in tough races who may feel that the move would leave them vulnerable to Republican attacks.
But Emanuel said the move is set. And he hopes to stage the resolution with as many as 12 retired generals and other military officers who have called for Rumsfeld's resignation.


Instead of fighting terrorism, they resist those who do stand against the new fascism, as the appeasers of Hitler once did.
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive
« Previous1Next »